Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - Accounting and Financial Close
Viewing all 447 articles
Browse latest View live

IDOCS, exchange rates and cost centers.

$
0
0

Hi gurus,

 

I´ll try to simplify this strange issue affecting IDOCS, exchange rates and cost centers.

 

 

The problem is with a Sales interface through IDOCS.

 

 

We have discovered that inserting a cost center in the IDOC (for revenue P&L accounts), this is affecting the final values, when the FI journal is incoming with a document currency (i.e. EUR) different from the local one. (i.e. GBP)

 

How this can be? I mean: when we add a cost center to the P&L account (it has to go with cost center, because the account is also created as Cost element), the values in the local currency are not what expected, despite the IDOC file reflects the correct amount to post (in EUR and in GBP). But, when we delete the cost center, before processing the IDOC (in a given P&L account which is not cost element and does not require a cost center), the processing of the IDOC is perfect, and the amounts posted are just what is declared in the IDOC.

 

This perfomance is detected in IDOCS which are posted in document currency different from local currency. The difference is detected when they use cost centers, and it is in an item of the local currency, whereas the values for the document currency are perfect.

 

How this can happen??

 

Any hints on how to have the correct amounts using cost centers? I understand by correct, the amounts posted when there is no cost center in the IDOC. We need to use cost centers on those P&L accounts, but system does not post the exact amounts in both currencies (only in EUR), although the IDOC is sending the exact amounts to post: in EUR and in GBP. There is a change when posting, due to the cost center....

 

Please, any ideas on what to check or do?

 

Thanks in advance


Check payment in Israel – Legal requirement

$
0
0

Check payment in Israel – Legal requirement
In order to pay some local vendors (mostly taxes related but not only eg. Ministry Of Health, Taxes, Clinical trials), the only legal option in Israel is to provide check as payment method. Is this legal requirement true and correct?

 

• Check payment in Israel – Applicable solution
Client SAP template solution provide a functionality named "World Link" that allow the bank to print check on their behalf by raising the payment request directly from SAP. This option has been discarded as local Bank is not able to support it. In order to define the proper solution, client asked Accenture guidance on the below matters:
o Is this a problem with our client bank (CITI Bank), as they are not able to offer the right services?
o Is the issue with Israeli regulations, that someone else cannot write a check on behalf of MSD?
o How is this process normally handled in Israel? E.g Does each company write its own checks via systems or manually?

 

Could you please check if someone in worked on this?

 

In my client not following, The point is that does not want to manage the print in house
and wants to know how other companies in Israel do?

Can't transfer data from SAP FC to Disclosure Management

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have been trying to transfer data from SAP FC to SAP Disclosure Manageent. Following a guide on SCN, I could establish a connection between FC and DM, created a report bundle in SAP FC, and defined a task to transport data to DM. After successfully executing the task, nothing is transferred to disclosure management.

 

Does anyone have an idea please ?

 

 

Thanks in advance

Tax code flow

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have created a new tax code AA and in PO i have used this tax code when i will do GR and IR the tax code will automatically pick on the basis of PO, can any one explain me how does tax code flow from PO to MIGO and then MIGO to MIRO , if possible give table for Service entry sheet or GR and MIRO where i can view tax code is used.

 

Thanks & Regards

Kunal

FI & FA Period Close

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

This is regarding to close Fiscal year for FA & FI.

 

We are using SAP since long with One Company Code (Say 'X').

 

Now We have created New Company code (Say 'Y') with uploading data as on 29.02.2016. It's working Fine.

Actually i have uploaded data for FI as on 29.02.2016 for Company code 'Y'. But till date I have not uploaded data for fixed assets register for 'Y' company.

i.e if i execute AR01 for 'Y' company, will not get no data.

 

Now today, I have open New FA Year i.e 2016 for Company Code 'X'. Also Carry forwarded FI Balances for Company code 'X'.

 

Now my issue is as i have not uploaded Assets Register data for new Company code 'Y' for F.Y 2015 as on 29.02.2016 . So Can i open new FA F.Y (With Tcode AJRW).

 

Also can i carry forward FI balances for F.Y 2016 for New Company  Code 'Y'

 

Regards

Swati

Convergent Invoicing

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Does anyone know about the concept of convergent invoicing in FI-CA? On a high level this is a concept that is used for high volume businesses with integration capabilities to SD, CRM, IS-U & IS-T. I have been trying to configure integration with SD however I do not see the customising node for Convergent invoicing under the Contracts account area.

 

Also, does anyone know what are consumption & Billable items? When are these used? I already know they are not used in simple FI-CA integration with SD.

 

Regards

Hema.

Deprecation areas are not displaying

$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

 

In AA deprecation terms are not displaying in asset master can any one help me please urgent.

 

 

 

Regards,

Cherry.

vendor code and tax code requirment

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are having 2 vendors and 4 tax codes and all are same country.

 

Ex: Vendor--12345-Tax code-P1

 

                    6789------Tax code-P2

 

At the time of creation of the purchase order system should allow tax code P1 for vendor 12345 only and if user is trying to enter other than P2 system should give an error message.

 

How to full fill this requirement.

 

Thanks

Ram


Incorrect entries in FLAGLFLEXT table

$
0
0

I have an issue where I am seeing incorrect entries in Flaglflext Table . I have posted a JE to FY2015 for non leading ledger using FB50L. The entries are showing correctly in Flaglflexa and Flaglflext table for FY2015 . The issue is the same entries are showing in Flaglflext Table as balance carry forward for 2016.  This is causing the balance differences when compared between leading and non leading ledger. Please help me understand why these entries are showing in Flaglflext table as balance carry forward and how to correct these entries .

 

Appreciate your quick response on this.

 

Thanks,

Kumar

Vendor posting in Cash Journal with tax code

$
0
0

Hello,

 

we have a requirement that some of the cash payments entered thorugh the Cash Journal (FBCJ) should have VAT calculated and included in VAT reporting. But in FBCJ when entering business transaction with vendor the system does not accept entering tax code and removes it with message "Business transaction does not require tax code, deleting field content". Does it mean it is not possible to have VAT in the cash journal with vendor or customer?

Account receivables at F110

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I have a question on F110 transaction.

 

There is a trading partner, and it is our vendor and our customer simultaneously.

That customer account often has some balances, we would like to pay its account payable amounts excluding its account receivable amount.

 

Is it automatically possible at F110 transaction?

If possible, please let me know how to do it?

 

Thanks.

BR,

Chris Kim

MIRO or currency issue

$
0
0

Hi,

Can you please help:

While creating credit memo against to the MIRO(  mrio has some issue so, want to create credit memo)  but  getting issue in balance field. 

 

Error: Balance not zero : 60.12 debit 211, credit 20.

 

I have checked in OB08 T code , i know that  this amount 60..12 because of currency variation.

please reply how to resolve this error.

 

advance Thank you so much for fast reply.

Coefficient in SAP FC

$
0
0

Hello all !

 

I am a newbie in SAP FC where I just landed and had a need to perform q quite not basic thing.

So I have an account which should be the result of an arithmetic operation involving several other accounts. So after having read through the FC PDF guide, I understood that I have to create coefficients and functions. So I decided to start with a basic thing: Create a function which will render only one account as the coefficient, then I create a rule saying: A = B * C * factor (where B is an existing account, C is the coefficient and factor is 1). However, it does not give any results.

 

In creating my function, I used the ratio wizard as follows: (assuming this would render me the account I wanna multiply by)

 

ratio wizard.PNG

 

Could you please help on what I am doing wrong ?

 

 

Many Thanks in advance

Deleted business transaction in FBCJ

$
0
0

Some business transactions used in Cash Journal (FBCJ) were deleted and transported to another client where there are already posted transactions of this type. When trying to recreate these transactions, in order to reverse the entries, the system is assigning the next available numbers, so it is not possible to recreate them with the old numbers. In the client with the posted transactions it gives inconsistency warning message and saying to recreate the business transactions using correction report. Do you know which is this correction report or how to recreate business transactions with the original numbers?

Partial activation of document splitting

$
0
0

Hi Gurus:

 

We activated the document splitting just for a new company that has been bought. We had to do it because its accounting is based on different Profit Centers, and when paying documents with document currency different from local currency, when registering differences on exchange rates, F110 program was not able to allocate the exact cost center, based on the Profit center on the document to be paid.

 

System worked OK, with the activation of the Document Splitting, just for that company (we didn´t need to activate it for the reest, and besides, it was an unnecessary risk)

 

However, we have discovered that when registering intercompany logistics documents between the new company and the rest of the Group, there is a clear error pointing to the Document Splitting:

 

FAGL_LEDGER_CUST001 - Document Splitting is only activated partially in companies selected.


We will go-LIVE with the new conmpany in 2 weeks, so we are still able to delete the document splitting for the new company. Like this, intercompany documents work fine.


My questions are:


Is SAP unable to work fine in this scenario?, I mean: some companies without the activation done, and others with document splitting activated


Isn´t there something we could do in this scenario so that intercompany documents could be registered? Scenario: just new company with document splitting activated, and the rest (alreaing running in LIVE system) not activated.


And, if we delete the document splitting (so everything works fine), how could I allocate the correct cost center of the OKB9 (based on profit centers) for posting the risk of the exchange rate when paying through F110 documents where document currency is different from local currency? Validations, Substitutions?



Please, any suggestions or experience would be very appreciated.


Many thanks in advance


SAP NOTES 2142261

$
0
0

PLEASE IF ANY ONE ONE HAVE SAP NOTE 2142261 CAN SHARE WITH ME THANKS

Document Splitting, a question

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I´ll tell you our current scenario: 6 companies already running LIVE, without Document Splitting activated.

 

Two new company codes to GO LIVE in 2 weeks. The setting of the document Splitting is already activated in LIVE system only for the new companies. (no documents at all of any nature in LIVE ledger). It has been a minimun setting...

 

Most of the processes have been tested wih the Splitting activated, however we are seriously thinking in the end to DEACTIVATE the Document Splitting via customizing, of course before the GOING LIVE of the new companies. Because we don´t find a good reason to maintain 6 companies without the splitting, and 2 of them with splitting.

 

My questions are:

 

Do you foresee any problem in deactivating in LIVE the splitting, if it has only been activated for the new companies? Asked in another way: do you think that we can find errors in LIVE system, when the new companies start posting? As far now, we haven´t done anything in LIVE for those companies, but upload chart of accounts, cost centers and controlling orders.....so in my opinion, everything should work fine without errors...

 

My client is reluctant, because most of the processes were tested in INTEGRATION with the flag activated. So he think it is a risk to deactivate it now. But, a part from loosing some type of information by Profit Center, all the logistic documents, financial documents, payments, etc, etc...postings....should work OK....

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks in advance!

FV60: Park in 1 company code; Park & Post in another

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

We have a scenario where we have a user, who needs to have park Vendor invoice document when she/ he is working for company code:9000 the same user to have park & post form company code 9001.

 

I like to know how to achieve this by managing the roles/ profiles / authorization object.

 

Thanks

Anand

Issue in FB02

$
0
0

Hi,

 

i have issue in FB02. particular user not able to remove payment block option from FB02 and to do vendor payment.    i checked all authorization access is available for user.

apart from that what could be the reason ?


i checked for substitution is available in this company code for vendor payment process.  how to check if user is assigned to substitution rule?

 

Thanks,.

Add credit info no as field in FBL1N

$
0
0

HI,

 

I have to Add "credit info no"  as  field in FBl1N  for a company code.  TABLE-"LFA1"  FIELD -"KRAUS".  Pls can any one tell it s possible and How?

Viewing all 447 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>